In this pivotal chapter, the courtroom serves as a microcosm for society's judgment, where Meursault's character comes under intense scrutiny. The trial, ostensibly about the murder of the Arab man, shifts its focus to Meursault's emotional detachment and his unconventional perspectives on life. The prosecutor presents a damning case that not only highlights the crime but also paints Meursault as a morally bankrupt individual, accusing him of a lack of grief over his mother's death and portraying his behavior as indicative of a deeper moral failing.

The trial proceedings are marked by a sense of absurdity; the prosecutor and defense attorney both engage in a spectacle that reflects societal norms rather than a pursuit of justice. Meursault's indifference, which was previously a source of personal freedom, becomes a liability in the eyes of the law. Observers of the trial are more interested in his character and emotional responses than in the specifics of the act he committed.

The prosecutor's arguments are fueled by sensationalism, describing Meursault as a 'monster' whose actions reflect a rejection of societal values. He points to Meursault's behavior at his mother's funeral, highlighting the protagonist's apparent lack of sorrow, which is used to suggest that he is incapable of emotion or empathy. This portrayal resonates with the jury, who become more invested in condemning Meursault for his perceived moral failings rather than understanding the context of the crime itself.

Witnesses are called to testify, and their accounts often reflect societal biases. They recount Meursault's actions and demeanor, interpreting them through their own lenses of morality, which further alienates him from the court. The courtroom atmosphere is charged with tension, and the narrative conveys Meursault's growing sense of isolation as he realizes that he is not being judged solely for his actions but for his very existence and nonconformity to societal expectations.

As Meursault listens to the proceedings, he feels detached, almost as if he is observing a performance rather than participating in a genuine judicial process. This detachment amplifies the absurdity of his situation; he understands that the trial is less about the murder and more about societal norms and the human need to impose meaning on life. The chapter culminates in a sense of inevitability regarding his condemnation, as Meursault recognizes that he is caught in a web of societal judgment that transcends reason or justice.

Ultimately, Chapter 7 emphasizes the themes of absurdism and existentialism, showcasing how Meursault's indifference leads to his downfall while also critiquing the arbitrary nature of societal morality and the judicial system.